On Thursday we had a debate on whether cell phones should or shouldn’t be in school for learning purposes.
Reflecting on this, here are some positives on the debate. 1) Some members spoke with a confident voice.
The negatives were that 1) Other speakers lacked confidence 2) Some speakers were interrupted by other speakers 3) We need to get the argument in speech form 4) Order of the speech in the actual debate.
I reckon that phones shouldn't be banned, because they are faster than laptops in many ways but have fewer compatibility than laptops, but have been proven to be the faster option with the fact that they have data (most of them not all) so that you can be anywhere and still be able to learn, and are able to connect to things faster.
